Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

The great "so, you ever read Watchmen?" poll

  • Dec. 11th, 2007 at 10:29 AM
SouthPart
As 20-year-old cold war comic series go, Watchmen has certainly proven to have staying power. 2009 will see the release of a film based on the iconic graphic novel.

I read on Progressive Ruin that at least in some comics stores Watchmen is still a strong seller. That led to the question, is there anyone who reads comics who hasn't read Watchmen?

So, yes. Poll. I think you know what to do now.

Poll #1104300 So, you ever read Watchmen?
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 96

Have you ever read Watchmen?

View Answers

I am a comic book reader, and I have read Watchmen.
70 (72.9%)

I am a comic book reader, and I have not read Watchmen.
8 (8.3%)

I am not a comic book reader, and I have read Watchmen.
13 (13.5%)

I am not a comic book reader, and I have not read Watchmen.
5 (5.2%)



p.s. If you're not sure if you're a comic book reader or not, you probably aren't.

Tags:



Comments

( 39 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]electricland wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 03:58 pm (UTC)
I'm more of a former comic book reader these days...
[info]tenzil wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 04:05 pm (UTC)
Yeah, me too, but I still occasionally buy TPBs.

Edited at 2007-12-11 04:05 pm (UTC)
[info]mouseferatu wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 09:31 pm (UTC)
That's where I am, as well.

And yep, I've read it.
[info]ghostwes wrote:
Dec. 12th, 2007 05:52 am (UTC)
Ditto here.
[info]uhlrik wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 06:04 pm (UTC)
I am likewise a former reader as well. Yeah, I've read it.
[info]creativedv8tion wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 08:33 pm (UTC)

Once a comic book reader...
[info]gurudata wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 10:03 pm (UTC)
Hiho,

Yeah, ditto... In fact, I blame Watchmen for being a former comic book reader - after Watchmen, there seeemed little point to read superhero comics anymore, really...

Cu,
Andrew
[info]ghostwes wrote:
Dec. 12th, 2007 05:53 am (UTC)
That's exactly how I felt. Though, to be fair, I have read some good stuff printed after Watchmen. Not as good, but still.
[info]thebitterguy wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2007 05:55 pm (UTC)
I tend to prefer a good puncheminnaface story (Planet Hulk & WWH both satisfied in different ways), or something cosmic (the Sinestro Corps War scratched THAT itch) or just funny (Slott's She Hulk or Franklin Richards, Son of a Genius both fulfill that need) to more serious spandex fare.
[info]ghostwes wrote:
Dec. 14th, 2007 12:28 am (UTC)
WWH?

I did enjoy Peter David and McFarlane's run on the hulk (which may have come after Watchmen, come to think of it). Other than that, though, I've never found the Hulk to be a very compelling character. All that "Hulk smash!" crap gets on my nerves.
[info]james_nicoll wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 04:09 pm (UTC)
Late Cold War. Watchmen was what, 1987? The Wall came down in 1989 and SU was dead by 1991.
[info]antikythera wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 04:15 pm (UTC)
I see that I am so far the only comic book reader who has not read Watchmen. This may be because I tend to gravitate towards Japanese comics, but also because most of my comic reading is determined by what the library has on the graphic novel shelf.
[info]thebitterguy wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 04:22 pm (UTC)
Your library doesn't have a copy on the shelf? That's odd.
[info]antikythera wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 04:45 pm (UTC)
It's gotta be around here somewhere, although I've never seen it on the shelf in a branch. I'll look it up and order it.

I suspect that if nowhere else, there's a non-circulating copy in the Merril Collection. Graphic novels often seem to go missing from the system, and end up kept in collections where they aren't allowed to leave the building.
[info]thebitterguy wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 04:57 pm (UTC)
Well, if all else fails I have a battered copy you can borrow.
[info]antikythera wrote:
Dec. 12th, 2007 12:24 am (UTC)
Already ordered, but thanks. :) And there are circulating copies.
[info]thebitterguy wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2007 05:56 pm (UTC)
Excellent. Let me (or everyone, in that case) know what you think.
[info]sixteenbynine wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 04:35 pm (UTC)
I'm in the same boat as you, but "Watchmen" is one of the strongest comic titles in any language. I wonder if it was ever translated into Japanese, actually.
[info]inscrutable wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 04:16 pm (UTC)
I bought a copy earlier this year for my girlfriend, and we've since loaned it out to a few friends who've never read it.
[info]optimussven wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 04:21 pm (UTC)
I'm not a comic reader, but I have read a few of the Sin City graphic novels, as well as V for Vendetta and a few Japanese graphic novels. If I were to dive into another, Watchmen would probably be a good bet. My GF is a huge comic book reader, but hasn't read Watchmen.
[info]absinthe_dot_ca wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 04:36 pm (UTC)
Problem with your methodology....?
What defines a "comic reader"? Buying at least one title a month? Five? Ten? Twenty? Buying everything Marvel, DC, and Dark Horse put out combined? Never buying anything put out by Marvel, DC, and Dark Horse because they're the "establishment" and you only read "indy" comics? Do you even need to "buy" comics to be a "reader", or can you just go back and re-read the last 20 years worth of comics you collected?

I don't make it to comic stores very often any more, but when I do I walk out with a few books, so I count myself as a reader, but I'm sure some will argue with that...

And yes, I read Watchmen back in 1991 or so, borrowed it from my room-mate's collection. I don't have a copy myself, although I've been thinking of picking up the TPB.
[info]thebitterguy wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 04:43 pm (UTC)
Re: Problem with your methodology....?
It's self defining. If you read comics with enough regularity to consider yourself a comics reader, tada. If not, good for you.

Besides, it's a poll on a livejournal. Not the definition of scientific.

Edited at 2007-12-11 04:45 pm (UTC)
[info]waiwode wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 04:47 pm (UTC)
One of the advantages of being old?

When The Watchmen started coming out in 1986 I was twenty. Me and all my friends devoured it, issue by issue.

Kevin already knew about Moore from his early 80's Swamp Thing. But that first cover*, with all the blood along the top half and part of the smiley face with the blood spatter on it down at the bottom? We new this wasn't going to be "the same old stuff."

And then it opens, with "A dog carcass in the alley."

For the first time in forever, we had "waiting for the next issue" anxiety. And the extra stories in the back? That (at the time) pointless pirate story? I hated it, taking away critical space out of each issue for what was throughout the eighties a common feature in small-press comics, the "filler project."

Doug.

*Honestly, I think the stone angel from issue #2 was my favourite.
[info]willow_kat wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 05:16 pm (UTC)
I borrowed a copy from the library and started reading it, but didn't make it very far because I couldn't understand anything that went on. I don't see what the big deal is.
[info]uhlrik wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 10:36 pm (UTC)
It's really really caught up in a lot of Cold War stuff, which can make it a little tougher for younger folks to follow.
[info]willow_kat wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 10:38 pm (UTC)
That could explain it, then, as I know next to nothing about the Cold War (or wars in general, really)!
[info]thebitterguy wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2007 06:00 pm (UTC)
There are a number of sites that contain annotations for the series. I think you'd do well to try it again and consult some of them.

The story is well worth it.
[info]shara wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 07:10 pm (UTC)
Where's the part of the poll that asks "...and did you think it was even remotely as good as everyone told you it was going to be?"
[info]madmanofprague wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 07:35 pm (UTC)
Was it better than most comics published around 1987? 'Cause that's what they meant.
[info]shara wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 09:08 pm (UTC)
Yah, after I read it the first time and sort of yawned, I was informed that it was more important for its historical value, its effect on comics, etc etc etc.

And, to blaspheme (sorry, bitterdude) further, I'd say that means it hasn't aged particularily well, but will nevertheless be a mainstay of Comic Book Studies courses for generations to come.
[info]madmanofprague wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 09:57 pm (UTC)
So why didn't you like it?
[info]madmanofprague wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 10:25 pm (UTC)
Or rather, what about it did you not like?
[info]thebitterguy wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2007 06:10 pm (UTC)
It's like I don't even know who you are anymore.
[info]thebitterguy wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 07:57 pm (UTC)
Because I don't cotton to blasphemy.
[info]lab_brat wrote:
Dec. 11th, 2007 07:48 pm (UTC)
I've read some of it, but not all of it. I still checked the first box tho. :D
[info]thebitterguy wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2007 06:02 pm (UTC)
I strongly endorse getting it and finishing it. I still find it to be quite a satisfying read.
[info]ladystarstruck wrote:
Dec. 12th, 2007 01:54 am (UTC)
You can get the latest printing of the trade compilation at Chapters and Indigo, where I was surprised to find a big section containing a great number of collected series. It wasn't even next to the manga.
[info]thebitterguy wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2007 06:09 pm (UTC)
They always have the GNs lumped with Manga whenever I go there.

Apparently, the contract specifies that if it goes out of print Moore gets the rights to the series back.
[info]granolademonic wrote:
Dec. 12th, 2007 02:50 am (UTC)
I've said before, the magic of WATCHMEN is that it defies deconstruction; I try to stay distant and analytical, but by the time it's wrapping up, I'm just pumping my fist and cheering as Rorschach and Nite Owl jet through the arctic on their scooters.

And this is what I think of the movie:


http://www.popmatters.com/pm/columns/article/41478/who-will-watch-the-watchmen/
( 39 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

January 2010
S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Tags

map

Locations of visitors to this page

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow